Something terrible happened. In the 1960’s, Charles Manson, a man responsible for the deaths of dozens of Americans, went to trial.

Disgraceful.

Why did we ever let him go to court?!!?

What if he had gotten off on some kind of technicality? Why did his liberal lawyers demand that he go to trial when we all knew that he was guilty of such atrocities?  What if he had escaped and killed more people while he was being transported to trial? What if the chance to go to trial in itself gave him a platform to twist more minds with his evil charms?

He never should have gone to trial. It was too dangerous, too insensitive l towards America and her needs.

I hope you thought that previous section was just retarded. It was. And so are all the people saying they have a problem with letting some of the people responsible for 9/11 Terror attacks being tried in a court of law.

If I killed someone in cold blood, we would call for justice in this country. We get justice by sending me to trial. That is the American way. In fact, trial makes sure that the innocent are acquitted and the guilty are brought to justice. If the ridiculous Conservative and Republican officials who are speaking out against this move really feel the way they say they do, their real issue is with their poor understanding of the US legal system.

Why take advice from Republicans on dealing with terrorism anyway? It’s like asking a fat person how they avoid the carbs.